User talk:El Grafo/Archive 10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

02:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

My Kristina.jpg and Autoportrait_With_Diadem_of_flowers_2005_oil_canvas_90_105_cm_Gryte_Pintukaite_Valeckiene

I would like that someone explains me the reasons to delete my jpgs. For more then one month everything was ok. By sure I know that I have the authorizations from the author (that I sent). What there is not, is a paper that shows that I can't use these files. Is it possible that you decide to delete these files when someone shows a request for that? Or you want to investigate about the contract that the author of the painting has with the museums? I don't think so...So again, here someone decided that museums don't allow to use the reproduction of a painting without having: 1) a document from museums 2) know about the contract between the creator of the work and the museum.

So, maybe I can ask to remove all the paintings in Wikipedia that belong to museums? Is it like that? Thank you so much El Grafo--Eurialo444 (talk) 15:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Eurialo444, I understand your frustration, and unfortunately you're not alone with that. Personally, I am not an administrator nor a member of the support team, so I am not able to help you in any direct manner. But I can try to explain the processes here: Everything on Commons is done by volunteers in their spare time. Thousands (or more) of images are being uploaded every day. Some volunteers spend a lot of time watching the latest uploads at Special:NewFiles for things like copyright violations. There are huge amounts of copyright violations uploaded every hour, and most of them get caught within minutes and are deleted right away. But some are not. Sometimes it takes a while until someone finds out that there is (or seems to be) something wrong with a file. In your case it was a month, sometimes it's years. We have to take copyright very seriously. You may have a permission to upload these paintings here, but there are so many people just uploading other people's artwork they found somewhere on the internet that unfortunately we have to insist on some kind of evidence. It is unfortunate that it took so long for someone to notify you, and I would like to apologize for that in the name of the Commons community. We all would like this to be a smoother experience, but as mentioned elsewhere we're just lacking the manpower. Hope that helps at least a bit. --El Grafo (talk) 16:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I did a German translation for the description of this photo. Could you check it for accuracy? Change it if that's needed. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 17:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem: done. --El Grafo (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Danke. PumpkinSky talk 20:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

22:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

19:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Rathaus St. Georgen (Bayreuth).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of St. Georgen (Bayreuth), view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Datura innoxia - immature flower.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Datura innoxia (pricklyburr), immature flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Datura innoxia - habitus.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Datura innoxia (pricklyburr), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ENR L01.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chet Jariwala (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

Crataegus maximowiczii ÖBG 2012-05-20 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crataegus maximowiczii (flowering), habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Ventus 2cxM D-KCXM 05.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bug wipers, parking position.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Cañada de los Guancheros - landscape features.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañada de los Guancheros - landscape features.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Prometheus by Frans Huygelen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prometheus by Frans Huygelen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rathaus St. Georgen (Bayreuth).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus St. Georgen (Bayreuth).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hauptpost Bayreuth.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptpost Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bayreuth Carl-Schüller-Straße 1, front door.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayreuth Carl-Schüller-Straße 1, front door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter, July 19, 2017

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons?

The millions of files on Wikimedia Commons are described with a lot of information or (meta)data. With the project Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons, this data is structured more, and is made machine-readable. This will make it easier to view, search (also multilingually), edit, organize and re-use the files on Commons.

In early 2017, the Sloan Foundation funded this project (see documentation). Development takes place in 2017–2020. It involves staff from the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Deutschland (WMDE) and many volunteers. To achieve this, Wikibase support is added to Wikimedia Commons. Wikibase is the technology that is also used for Wikidata.

Recent developments: groundwork

  • A new and crucial technical step (federation) now makes it possible to reference data from one Wikibase website in another. Because of this, it will be possible to use Wikidata's items and properties to describe media files on Commons.
  • Another important piece of groundwork is under development: so-called Multi-Content Revisions. This feature allows structured data to be stored alongside wiki text, so that one wiki page can contain several types of content.

Team updates

  • Amanda Bittaker was hired as Program Manager for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. Amanda will take care of the overall management of the project.
  • Sandra Fauconnier (known as Spinster in her volunteer capacity) is the new Community Liaison. She will support the collaboration between the communities (Commons, Wikidata, GLAM) and the product development teams at the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Deutschland.
  • We have open positions for a UX designer and a Product Manager!

Talking with communities and allies

  • Long-term feedback from GLAMs. Besides the Wikimedia community, many external cultural and knowledge institutions (GLAMs - Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) are interested in Structured Data on Commons and are willing to provide feedback on the long-term plans for the project. Alex Stinson, GLAM strategist at the Wikimedia Foundation, is currently in contact with Europeana, DPLA, the Smithsonian and the National Archives of the United States. Alex is also looking for other GLAM institutions who might be able to advise on the long term. If you know of an institution or partner that may be appropriate for consultation, do get in touch with Alex.
  • Jonathan Morgan, design researcher, is starting to work on two projects:

What comes next?

  • The Structured Data on Commons team meets in the week after Wikimania to lay the groundwork for the next steps. This includes new backend development and design work, for better and more clear integration of the structured data in pages on Wikimedia Commons.
  • The project's information pages on Wikimedia Commons will receive a long overdue update in the upcoming months. The team will also work on more and better communication channels. Feedback, wishes and tips are welcome at the project's general talk page.

Get involved

Many greetings from SandraF (WMF) (talk), Community Liaison for this project! 13:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

User-space-Templates

Hallo! Ich habe deine Bemerkung bei der Bewertung eines meiner FPCs sehrwohl gelesen. Zugegeben, mit einem gewissen Schmunzeln. Als jemand, der aus der IT kommt, neigt man im Rahmen der Möglichkeiten immer etwas zum Vereinfachen, in diesem Fall des Änderungsaufwands. Ich ziehe es halt vor, im Falle von Änderungen möglichst immer nur eine Stelle zu ändern. Allerdings erkauft man sich so etwas mit schlechter lesbarem Quelltext. Gleichzeitig sollen HotCat etc. noch funktionieren und maschinenlesbare Informationen möchte ich für die zukünftige Datenstruktur auch noch unterbringen. Der genannte Rahmen der Möglichkeiten ist klein, den Quelltext liest allerdings eh kaum jemand. Das Resultat siehst Du. Nichtsdestotrotz wünsche ich mir eigentlich auch eine andere Lösung. Bei vielen Dingen hoffe ich auf die strukturierten Daten und damit einer klareren Definition und anderen Benutzerrechten, die u. a. stärker die Rechte der Urheber beachten. Bisweilen überlege ich immer mal wieder, auf welchen meiner Bausteine ich verzichten möchte, finde aber keinen. Ich möchte den Bildnutzerinnen und -nutzern Informationen geben, aber auch unseren Mitstreiterinnen und Mitstreitern. Vieles entstand durch Fragen, die ich immer wieder beantworten darf, anderes aus Unzulänglichkeiten im Wikimedia-Commons-System. Der eine hätte es gerne einfacher, der andere aber die daraus resultierende Arbeit in der Betreuung nicht. Es ist schon kompliziert. Vielleicht findet sich ja irgendwann der goldene Weg. --XRay talk 09:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@XRay: Sorry wegen der späten Antwort, ich war ein paar Tage offline. Ich versteh' das Dilemma – hoffen wir mal dass StructuredData da Besserung bringt! --El Grafo (talk) 11:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

23:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Nikon SpeedLight SB-700.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon Speedlight SB-700.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

Old door in Bamberg (color version).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Old door in Bamberg (color version).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old door in Bamberg (color version).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)