User talk:El Grafo/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

08:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

13:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

File:Podoconiosis map.tif What do you think of this upload? Thanks again for all your help. Commons has templates for everything!! Now the image is shining on it's new home at Spanish Wikipedia. You are invited to read the article and find out about this forgotten disease. --Ninovolador (talk) 18:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Excellent job, there's nothing I would change. I don't speak Spanish, but I've read the english version. Interplay of genetics and soil conditions – that's fascinating, as Spock would say … --El Grafo (talk) 19:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you!

Minor Barnstar Hires.png The Minor barnstar
Great job! Thanks, Visit Ink in the trashy2's user page! (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Presenza di Ansaldo STS nel mondo.jpg

Hi El Grafo,

I am working to obtain the licenses required. I am confident to solve the situation soon.

Thank's

As for the video we were not able to obtain the open CC license as required by Wikimedia Commons, could you prceed with the file deletion? thanks

signing for ‎ArchiveBot --El Grafo (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

signing for ‎ArchiveBot --El Grafo (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Autorisation Photos

De: Matias-Roland Decraene <decraene@officebamboo.asia> À: permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org Sujet: Message de suppression de mes images par El Grafo Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:50:01 +0700 Client de messagerie: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6


Bonjour,

j'ai reçus des messages en anglais https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Humbe m'annonçant un problème avec mes images dans mon brouillon de page à l'adresse suivante https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilisateur:Humber/Brouillon&oldid=105676481

Je suis l'ayant droits de la succession Hector Cattolica depuis 1993; tous les droits réservés (représentation, diffusion, reproduction, modification, etc) m'appartiennent donc et je décide de placer certaines de mes images sous licence Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 France (CC BY-SA 2.0 FR) sous le nom de leur auteur original, Hector Cattolica, comme la Loi m'y autorise.

La liste de ces images :

   File:Images mobilepic.gif
   File:Lenrage11.jpg
   File:Ps4 déc 1980.jpeg
   File:Ps déc 1980.jpeg
   File:Ps3 déc 1980.jpeg
   File:Ps2 déc 1980.jpeg
   File:Urban.jpg
   File:Dibujo de H Cattolica 1.jpg
   File:Cattolica HE66-10.jpg
   File:Citizpic2.jpg
   File:Patriotism 2.jpg
   File:Signature Hector Cattolica.gif
   File:Pics spreadsml.gif
   File:Pics poster.gif
   File:D31f017b42a0a4a08cd60210.L.jpg
   File:Poster Hector Cattolica.jpeg
   File:Beau comme un homme.jpg
   File:Atelier-populaire.jpeg
   File:Patriotism.gif
   File:Retour à la normale.jpeg
   File:Portrait Hector Cattolica.gif
   File:Le dernier des métiers.jpg
   File:D9cd 2.JPG
   File:A-falta-de-otra-cosa-hector-cattolica-editorial-uno-1960-6225-MLA52641237 1326-O.jpg
   File:La Semeuse.jpg

Pour faire valoir ce que de droit, fait à HCMC, le 24 juillet 2014, par Matias-Roland Decraene

signing for ‎ArchiveBot --El Grafo (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

LED black light flashlight.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LED black light flashlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

05:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The Structured Data Bee, vol. 1, issue 1

Greetings, thank you for signing up for the Structured Data newsletter and its first edition. With this newsletter, the Structured data team plans on keeping you informed of technical progress, events, and communications to talk about the project, and continued information on how you can participate. This newsletter will be sent approximately every two weeks, and future editions will be translatable prior to publication. If you're new to Wikidata and want more information about how it works in relation to Wikimedia Commons, you can read an introduction to Wikidata for Commons being drafted.

Tech and design

  • The software development for this process is still in the planning phases. The idea is to have some functional prototyping done for experimentation and feedback by the end of the year.
  • The initial roadmap for development has been posted on Commons. The roadmap is a rough outline and is open to iterations as the team learns where and when to focus its energies.
  • There is a page set up for design ideas about what structured data could potentially look like.
  • There are forthcoming requests for comment about the particulars of technical architecture on mediawiki.org. Keep an eye on the Commons:Structured data/Get involved page for notification of when the RfCs are posted.

Events and chats

  • There was a week-long meeting between the Wikimedia Foundation's Multimedia team, the Wikidata team, and community members, held in Berlin, Germany, at the office of Wikimedia Deutchland on October 6-10. You can read an overview of the event in on this page on Commons. There are also plenty of pictures available on Wikimedia Commons.
  • If you would like to read more detail about what was discussed, there are etherpads of notes taken for each day of the event.
  • The second IRC office hour (logs) was held on October 16, and the first (logs) on September 3.

Getting involved

  • Sign up for this newsletter!
  • While working prototypes are being developed, there is a drive to make all files contain machine-readable data on Wikimedia projects.
  • A hub has been launched to facilitate communication and documentation for this work.
  • There is a frequently-asked questions page that is finishing drafting and will need translated. Keep an eye out for when it is ready if you are interested in translating.
  • There will be active organization of the Get involved page as community participation is further organized. There will be work groups, similar to specific Wikiprojects, dedicated to particular aspects of structured data like licensing presentation, design, API performance, and even helping out with this newsletter and other community communications.

There will be much more information and activities around the proposal to develop structured data on Wikimedia Commons. This project is a major undertaking and an important step as the chief provider, repository, and curator of media for Wikimedia projects.

Thank you for your participation in such an extensive project, let me know if you're interested in participating in this newsletter. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

RMC Tokina 24mm 1-2.8 (03).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RMC Tokina 24mm 1-2.8 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

RMC Tokina 24mm 1-2.8 (04).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RMC Tokina 24mm F2.8.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Allium oreophilum ÖBG 2014-05-25 (04).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Allium oreophilum (Pink Lily Leek), fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Bayreuther Bratwürste.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bayreuther Bratwurst.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Richtung

Hi El Grafo, habe gerade deinen Kommentar zu Commons talk:Structured data gelesen und mich gefragt, ob du eventuell weißt, warum beim Hochladen von Bildern mit dem UploadWizard die Richtung nicht aus den EXIF-Daten extrahiert und in das Location template übernommen wird. Beispiel: File:Wetterfahne auf der Kirche St. Otmar, Dosdorf.JPG. Danke und Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo Arnd, ich nehme an, dass man bei der Entwicklung des UploadWizard schlicht nicht daran gedacht hat, dies Funktion einzubauen. Ich bin mir auch nicht sicher, ob überhaupt eins der Commons:Upload tools das automatisch kann. Für Vicuña hatte ich hier mal darum gebeten das einzubauen, allerdings bisher ohne Reaktion seitens des Entwicklers … --El Grafo (talk) 21:12, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Danke dir für die Info. --Arnd (talk) 22:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Aschroet: nur zur Info: Die Funktion wurde für den UploadWizard schon vor Jahren gewünscht (bugzilla:37925), bisher leider ebenfalls ohne nennenswerte Reaktion der Entwickler. --El Grafo (talk) 12:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Coat of Arms Bayreuth (mosaic, town hall).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms Bayreuth (mosaic, town hall).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 11:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anton Bruckner - Gedenktafel Schlosskirche Bayreuth.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anton Bruckner - Gedenktafel Schlosskirche Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Markgräfliches Opernhaus Sanierung Sandsteinfassade.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Markgräfliches Opernhaus, sand stone restoration, color sample.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Muncy Creek

I responded to your request on the QIC review of the Muncy Creek picture. (It's under November 20). I'd be pleased if you could continue with the assessment. Thanks, --Jakob (talk) 19:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jakec: ✓ Done, thanks for the improvements (and for reminding me). --El Grafo (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Great, thanks! --Jakob (talk) 20:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

16:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Karl_W_Richter.jpg follow-up, request for review

Hi. We had a discussion about this file, or better said, you quite patiently responded to my whiney bleating with some suggestions. I tried to implement them as you suggested. Would you do me the favor of reviewing the form in which I added material to the template to ensure I didn't break format? I'd appreciate that. Thanks. Azx2 07:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Azx2, format-wise that's fine, I've just made the links a bit prettier. Copyright-wise, we still don't have 100% proof that this is an USAF-picture, but I guess I wouldn't nominate it for deletion if I came across this by chance. But then again (as previously mentioned), if I had uploaded this, I'd nominate it for deletion myself just to get further opinions from others. I'll leave that up to you … --El Grafo (talk) 10:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Change of scope

Hi, just realised I forgot to notify you. Considering your comment, I changed the scope of this VI nomitation. Feel free to give your opinion about this new scope. Yours sincerely, Gyrostat (talk) 11:30, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Thanks for the reminder! --El Grafo (talk) 14:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

sharpening

Thanks for the info. I read a bit about it from the links and agree the chaining sounds like a stupid idea. The testing feedback also sounds suspect. If you play music at people who are not experts they will pick the system that sounds loudest and brightest, even if such is fatiguing and full of distortion. So I suspect oversharpening may superficially make some pictures look crisp but unnaturally so. Turning off all sharpening is also a bad idea as people will complain their thumbnails are soft. It looks like they have reverted the chaining change. -- Colin (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Colin, I'm sorry that I obviously was a bit unclear at first. I wanted to keep it short to avoid cluttering the nomination page – seems like that backfired quite a bit ;-) On first sight, I found the chaining a quite clever idea to decrease server load, can't blame them for giving it a try. I think the revert is not live on Commons yet [85], I guess it will happen with the next regular update. Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

Timema poppense camouflaged on its host, Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), California.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timema poppensis Dorsal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello and thanks for translating this template into German! Please also translate the text in the three curly brackets, after the pipe (e.g. {{{event|the event}}}{{{event|der/die/das …}}}) in the 6th, 7th and 8th translation (I can also correct it if you say me the German word). Thanks again, --Tacsipacsi (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whoops, forgot that … thanks for the reminder, hope that's OK now? --El Grafo (talk) 21:52, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, it's good. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 22:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

16:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

BOSS Blues Driver BD-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BOSS Blues Driver BD-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Exakta 70-210mm F4.5-5.6 side.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exakta 70-210mm F4.5-5.6 side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support IMHO DOF not perfect, but acceptable. Good quality. --C messier 15:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Exakta 70-210mm F4.5-5.6 side long.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exakta 70-210mm F4.5-5.6 side long.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Fingerprints could have been avoided, but overall good quality. --C messier 15:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Yellowing of thorium lenses.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yellowing of Takumar lenses.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

18:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Antonov An-225 with Buran at Le Bourget 1989 Manteufel.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonov AN-225 carrying Buran (in flight).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Scallop diagram vote?

Hi, I noticed your comment on my nomination of my scallop diagram for featured picture (Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scallop Diagram2.svg). Please see my follow-up comment regarding image's new status as having passed validation, and consider changing your vote to a "Support"— today is the image's last day for consideration, and if you and one other voter switch your votes, the image will pass. Otherwise it seems likely to fail. I worked very hard on it, and I have gone back and addressed your concerns— I hope you will think about changing your vote before the clock runs out. Thank you! _KDS4444 (talk) 10:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done Thanks for reminding me! --El Grafo (talk) 12:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Siegerlandflughafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Recent changes 2015 (talk) 10:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

16:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)