Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Featured picture candidates

Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

3D film 2.svg Media 

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

FPCandiateicon.svg

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal thingsEdit

NominatingEdit

Guidelines for nominatorsEdit

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsEdit

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

PhotographsEdit

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audioEdit

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominationsEdit

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new usersEdit

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1

    STEP 1


STEP 2

  • STEP 2

    STEP 2


STEP 3

  • STEP 3

    STEP 3


STEP 4

  • STEP 4

    STEP 4


STEP 5

  • STEP 5

    STEP 5


STEP 6

  • STEP 6

    STEP 6


STEP 7

  • STEP 7

    STEP 7


STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)

    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nominationEdit

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Strongly recommended: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

VotingEdit

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting question.svg Question),
  • {{Request}} (Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Featured picture delisting candidatesEdit

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}} Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

Featured picture candidate policyEdit

General rulesEdit

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5)
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have no support (apart from the nominator).
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.)
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rulesEdit

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven Symbol support vote.svg Support votes (or 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be politeEdit

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken.

See alsoEdit

Table of contentsEdit

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:Pedro Américo - D. Pedro II na abertura da Assembléia Geral.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2023 at 23:24:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Aerial image of Stromboli (view from the northeast).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2023 at 17:49:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Alla fonte.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2023 at 13:06:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Breil-Brigels in Graubünden. 23-09-2022. (actm.) 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2023 at 05:53:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Église Sainte-Famille-de-l'Île-d'Orléans.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2023 at 03:48:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Kiwifruit 'Red Passion' cross section - Italy.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2023 at 15:40:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Red Kangaroos at Sturt National Park NSW.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2023 at 15:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:20210131 twig withBuds coveredByIce DSC05404 PtrQs.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2023 at 08:36:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice
  •   Info Twig with buds, covered by ice. Created and uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by me, --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Under all the submissions for this month’s photo challenge, this one immediately caught my eye. Yes, it’s simple, but I like exactly the simplicity. Most of us have seen a branch like this covered in ice, but most of the time we don’t look closely; the photo shows how much elegance and beauty we miss out on. Since it’s an ice-and-snow shot, the almost blank white background is fine, it enhances the minimalist composition. --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks for the nomination and the apt image analysis. (That photo caught my eye while sorting the recently promoted QIs.) -- Radomianin (talk) 09:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Jakubhal 13:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I was walking in December in similar conditions and felt sorry not to have my camera with me - but this is a much better capture than I would have managed. Thanks for nominating, Aristeas! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. Great details of the buds below the ice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosalina 🍵 454576 07:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --BigDom (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Wschód słońca nad Kanałem Łączańskim w Brzeźnicy, 20211009 0711 3152.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2023 at 07:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Fog
  •   Info Sunrise over foggy Łączany-Skawina channel in Brzeźnica, Poland. All by me -- Jakubhal 07:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Jakubhal 07:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Very atmospheric, well done. --Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support This is a perfectly captured sunrise. --A.Savin 15:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per others, especially Alex. I can feel the sunrise to such a degree that I am imagining the birds singing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosalina 🍵 463175 07:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --BigDom (talk) 13:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Basílica de Santa María la Mayor, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 22-24 HDR.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2023 at 15:48:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Fuente de Trevi, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-15, DD 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2023 at 15:40:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
  •   Info The Trevi Fountain (in italian Fontana di Trevi), Rome, Italy. The fountain is an 18th-century fountain in the Trevi district in Rome, Italy, designed by Italian architect Nicola Salvi and completed by Giuseppe Pannini and several others. Standing 26.3 metres (86 ft) high and 49.15 metres (161.3 ft) wide, it is the largest Baroque fountain in the city and one of the most famous fountains in the world. Note: there is only one partial FP (statue of Oceanus) of this subject. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Well captured, interesting angle. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Definitely should replace Livio's picture where it's still being used. --A.Savin 15:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosalina 🍵 471941 07:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Fresh take on a building that I would say is the most frequently photographed in Rome, but for the several other buildings in Rome one could say that about. Ideally I'd photograph this in grayscale, at night, with Anita Ekberg and Marcello Mastroianni frolicking in the waters, but one can only wish for so much. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Saint John church in Caselles (8).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2023 at 12:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Andorra
  •   Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful composition, light and clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment The light is quite bad, in my opinion, because the sun is in front. It is visible from the shadow of the pillar oriented towards us. And what we see in this picture is the shadowy side of the building. It cannot be fixed, but I think it's worth mentioning it -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment In music, sometimes a moment can be emphasized by being softer than the rest. I think a similar thing can happen with the darker part being the subject, against a bright sky. Perhaps that's an unorthodox reaction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • I would have preferred the music brighter :-) Basile Morin (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support I second Ikan’s point that the church stands out due to the shadows; in addition in full-size view it does not appear too dark but shows many details. I am rather irritated by the stuff at the right; probably it was unavoidable, but it is still a bit ugly. --Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I would crop the road sign and the pole at right. Yann (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosalina 🍵 478146 07:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Dull light, washed out colors, and the right part is distracting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Agree, bad timing and I've had probaly croppe a bunch at the right Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I'm not bothered by the stuff at the right as the image's leading lines are strong enough. For those who are, I have suggested a crop.

    Nor does the light bother me ... it's early spring, of course it will be harsh, and to me that gives it its own beauty. Perhaps some !voters think it would only look good in midsummer with trees in full leaf and blue sky with little white fluffy clouds. But that would look too much like so many other FP nominees. Here we have a landscape whose colors reinforce/are reinforced by that of the subject building, which wouldn't be the case in warmer weather.

    Plus it's also nice to have an FP of Andorra. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Castle of Varazdin (17).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2023 at 11:46:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Массив Ачешбок, Адыгея, Acheshbok, Adygea.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2023 at 11:32:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
  •   Info Acheshbok mountain massif and Shisha River headwaters valley in somewhat menacing weather conditions, Republic of Adygea, Western Caucasus. The landscape represents the Early Mesozoic evolution of the Western Caucasus, its Triassic-Jurassic sedimentary and magmatic history. Created, uploaded, nominated by --Argenberg (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Argenberg (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support--Ermell (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosalina R 474585 01:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice landscape, good framing. I wish the background was even sharper, but there was probably some haze. --Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --A.Savin 15:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Snow on the distant mountains looks more like slopped white paint, but it's so far away as to make up a minuscule part of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img17 Marienkirche.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2023 at 16:33:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0509-13.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2023 at 17:59:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •   Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 17:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Info It's a detail. The detail of a whale with wavy shapes is opposite the round window, the rather monotonous gray is opposite the colorful window, the sharp whale is opposite the blurred window. In this form, I see the image as photo art. Or not? My guess is that the contrasts will continue in the reviews. -- XRay 💬 17:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- XRay 💬 17:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Guess what side I am on ;) --Kritzolina (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Works perfectly in portrait full screen mode. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452680 08:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Impressive juxtaposition of the colourful rose window and the grey, but richly structured whale detail.--Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 11:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Here is the contrast opinion. This is a very experimental image, and I considered it for a while. But sorry, no, I cannot go with it. One of my points: not only the background, but almost half of the whale or what we see from it is out of focus. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your assessment and good description of your motivations. It is helpful like that. When I took the shot, it was important to me that the foreground be sharp and the window have the appropriate degree of blur. This conditions that the slightly more distant part of the whale already shows a slight blur, but without being really noticeable in the overall impression. --XRay 💬 05:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Waldbillig (LU), Schiessentümpel -- 2015 -- 6033.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2023 at 17:52:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Human karyotype with bands and sub-bands.pngEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2023 at 17:20:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Wachau vom Gochelberg 20220519 01.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2023 at 15:42:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Groom Nepal.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2023 at 08:01:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Julitta und Quiricus, Andiast (d.j.b.) 07.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2023 at 05:41:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:New snow on young oaks in Tuntorp.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2023 at 22:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Container-Terminal Bremerhaven 02.jpg, featuredEdit

Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2023 at 21:20:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
  •   Info created and uploaded by Llez - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Cranes are nicely depicted.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:33, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I also like the clear colours. --Aristeas (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- XRay 💬 18:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks for the nomination --Llez (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Really good eye and imagination to see the good composition in these ordinary objects. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think really very tight crop at the bottom, isn't it? --A.Savin 16:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support The background is a bit blurry, and I agree that the crop is rather tight at the bottom. Otherwise nice structures / patterns taken in good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Surprised it took this long for someone to nominate a photo of some port cranes. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak support per Basile. I really like the composition, but I have to agree about the crop and the OOF areas. BigDom (talk) 05:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451247 08:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Caspar David Friedrich - Wanderer above the sea of fog.jpg (delist)Edit

Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2023 at 07:38:28
   

  •   Info The quality is no longer good enough 16 years later. (Original nomination)
  •   Delist and replace This proposed replacement is the best version I could find online and while it is a huge improvement, it is not perfect. So, I do not mind if any of you would like to delist without replacing -- StellarHalo (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace -- Ivar (talk) 09:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace I fixed the license. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Indeed the replacement is not perfect (somewhat oversharpened), but much better than the current FP. --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Clearly better than the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace The improved version does enough justice to this mesmerizing painting. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Rosalina R 470981 08:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Grant DeVolson Wood - American Gothic.jpg (delist)Edit

Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2023 at 07:03:54
   

  •   Info Out of all the famous paintings in the history of western art, this painting is one of my least favorites. But, given its importance to 20th century American art, we should probably keep a version of it as FP. Since the current FP is too small, we should replace it with the larger version I uploaded recently. (Original nomination)
  •   Delist and replace The Google Art Project version is actually slighter larger than the version I uploaded but its bottom left corner is blurry. -- StellarHalo (talk) 07:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace -- Ivar (talk) 09:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace I fixed the license. --Yann (talk) 09:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Aristeas (talk) 13:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Higher resolution, and the colors seem slightly improved -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace Rosalina R 466784 08:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Delist and replace --SHB2000 (talk) 00:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Божићна вечера (traditional Christmas dinner; Folklore of Serbia).jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2023 at 18:25:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
  •   Info Traditional Christmas dinner by the candles. My photo. -- Mile (talk) 18:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Info Try to check the photo by night.
  •   Support -- Mile (talk) 18:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful. My only concern is a non-compositional one: for fire safety, could the leaves be further from the flame? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment The crop is tight at the left, and at the top. Although this is a special lighting, I think the picture is slightly underexposed overall -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Ikan Kekek thats Badnjak, it suppose to be burnt day before X-mas, but not in the flat. Basile Morin i added exsposure, if i put it a bit more, exposure would be unreal. So i asked to be checked by night. --Mile (talk) 06:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Lighting slightly improved in my view. But vote   Neutral because not enough space at the borders. (Imagine this picture with a frame eating away at the margins, then the content lacks space) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Basile Morin OK, we agree with exposure, i would not push EV more. I also just added 150 px in wide and 100 px above. --Mile (talk) 07:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support yes, acceptable now in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose I just find it a little too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Daniel. The arrangement doesn't work for me: The food should be the clear star of the show here, but somehow it's not. --El Grafo (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Atmospheric and educative. The arrangement works for me, assuming that it shows a typical traditional table decoration for this meal. --Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosalina R 453529 10:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Daniel. -- Karelj (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Church, Göttweig Abbey, Austria, 20210729 1426 1033.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2023 at 08:24:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:St David's Hotel from Cardiff Bay Wetlands Reserve.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2023 at 14:30:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
  •   Info First time I've dared to nominate one of my photos for FP. I like the colours in this one and the way the huge hotel looms over the peaceful wetlands and dwarfs the buildings in the background. Created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- BigDom (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good technical quality. To be honest I am not a fan of this kind of architecture ;–), but the contrast between the modernist hotel building and the peaceful nature in front of it makes this a “wow” photo for me. --Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support I like the coots. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm not fascinated neither by the level of detail nor by the composition, it lacks wow to me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 08:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support A UK winter scene that doesn't deny it's winter, but at the same time doesn't make you think you'd be perfectly miserable if you were in it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with Poco.--Ermell (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose It's okay, but not exceptional. The building at the right, included in the composition, is ugly. The main one at the left is slightly original but apart from the roof, its architecture is still very moderately innovative -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Rosalina 🍵 473185 09:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)Edit

Mon 16 Jan → Sat 21 Jan
Tue 17 Jan → Sun 22 Jan
Wed 18 Jan → Mon 23 Jan
Thu 19 Jan → Tue 24 Jan
Fri 20 Jan → Wed 25 Jan
Sat 21 Jan → Thu 26 Jan

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)Edit

Thu 12 Jan → Sat 21 Jan
Fri 13 Jan → Sun 22 Jan
Sat 14 Jan → Mon 23 Jan
Sun 15 Jan → Tue 24 Jan
Mon 16 Jan → Wed 25 Jan
Tue 17 Jan → Thu 26 Jan
Wed 18 Jan → Fri 27 Jan
Thu 19 Jan → Sat 28 Jan
Fri 20 Jan → Sun 29 Jan
Sat 21 Jan → Mon 30 Jan

Closing a featured picture promotion requestEdit

The botEdit

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedureEdit

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to an appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2023), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting requestEdit

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2023.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night shots, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nominationEdit

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2023), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=722614329"