↓ Skip to nominations ↓

Other languages:

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose[edit]

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines[edit]

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators[edit]

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements[edit]

Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements[edit]

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality[edit]

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting[edit]

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value[edit]

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate[edit]

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations[edit]

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images[edit]

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review[edit]

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion[edit]

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision[edit]

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2023.
Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2023.

Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 21 2023 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules[edit]

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 05:45, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day.

January 21, 2023[edit]

- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz View of the mountain flanks above Waltensburg/Vuorz.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Burg Kropfenstein (Casti Grotta)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Burg Kropfenstein (Casti Grotta)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Stone carved with symbols. --Rjcastillo 03:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cannon on the Santa Lucía hill. --Rjcastillo 03:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Round Garden. Santa Lucia Hill. --Rjcastillo 03:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Hidalgo Castle Tower. --Rjcastillo 03:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Kiosk selling sweets and soft drinks. --Rjcastillo 03:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Unterdellach and the Mittagskogel in the Karawanks mountain-range in the background, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Johannes Brahms Promenade next to the Werzer tennis arena, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  I don't see the tennis court. The description and CATs need changing? --Tagooty 04:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. I altered the description of the image. —- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Telephone booth on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Johannes Brahms Promenade next to the Werzer tennis arena, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  I don't see the tennis court. The description and CATs need changing? --Tagooty 04:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. I altered the description of the image. —- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Watchtower and walkways in the former arsenal in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Oak at the heart pond in the wildlife park in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Arcades of the Nieuwe Kerk inMiddelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cannons at the entrance to the port, Veere, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View from the beach to the Western Scheldt, Zoutelande, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 20, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: The Great Hall in the Parliament House of Australia, Canberra (by JJ Harrison --SHB2000 00:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed

January 20, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Estação de Paranapiacaba, Brasil --Mike Peel 21:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Museu Tecnológico Ferroviário, Paranapiacaba --Mike Peel 21:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination View of Dimitsana. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Church of the Taxiarches in Dimitsana, Arcadia. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ancient walls within Dimitsana, Arcadia. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The library of Dimitsana. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Tower of Xenios, Dimitsana. --C messier 20:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Mazda CX-60 PHEV in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 20:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. May be better with more space around. --XRay 03:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Renault Megane IV Sedan in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 20:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Judas tree (Cercis siliquastrum) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Barge on the Haute-Deûle canal, near the port of Lille, France --Velvet 17:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Art Deco building, Rue Racine 90, in Lille, France --Velvet 17:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination GIF Ambigram of the word "ফারিন" (Farin in Bengali Script) by MS Sakib. -- MS Sakib (talk)16:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination: Mäusebussard auf der Suche nach Beute, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland, --Fischer.H 16:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination War memorial (stone) by Aristide Maillol in Banyuls-sur-Mer, France. --Palauenc05 16:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination AEV Brute in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: GMC Yukon XL Denali in Ostfildern.--Alexander-93 16:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Maserati Grecale Modenain Böblingen.--Alexander-93 16:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Marciano Durán (father) and Marciano Durán (son), writers from Uruguay, in Argentino Hotel of Piriapolis, Uruguay --Ezarate 14:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination House with a sailor's pompom in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 14:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 15:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Justin Onyejiaka (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Quantez Robertson (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Alexander Richardson (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Justin Onyejiaka (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2022/23, 13th day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt (99:74) – Matt Haarms (Fraport Skyliners Frankfurt) --Sandro Halank 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Marciano Durán, writer from Uruguay, signing a copy of his book Artigas, cara a cara (Artigas, face to face) in Argentino Hotel of Piriapólis, Uruguay --Ezarate 13:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Too much (chroma) noise --Poco a poco 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  done, thanks --Ezarate 15:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Garland flower (Daphne cneorum) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Polittico Quaratesi, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Ognissanti polyptych by Giovanni da Milano, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Annunciation by Simone Martini and Lippo Memmi, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Diptych of Federico da Montefeltro and Battista Sforza, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination San Romano Battle by Paolo Uccello, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 12:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: An European Paper Wasp on a flower --FlocciNivis 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination View over a couple of trees and another building to the Uptown in Munich --FlocciNivis 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: The construction site of the bus depot Moosach with office building in Munich --FlocciNivis 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  It needs a perspective correction and too much noise, I believe --Poco a poco 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: View on the small forest Kleiner Hart in the nature reserve Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide --FlocciNivis 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Platforms and trains in Bamberg station --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Pfister bridge and tracks south of Bamberg station --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Parking deck on the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Glass roof of the Wandelhalle in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Staircase in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 09:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Hospital corridor in the “Marienhaus Klinikum Hetzelstift“
  --F. Riedelio 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Epilepsiezentrum Kork, view from south
  --F. Riedelio 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The University Hospital Mannheim viewed from the telecommunication tower
  --F. Riedelio 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Collonade, Palais Rohan, Bordeaux. --DimiTalen 08:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Tilted in cw direction, look at the entrance --Poco a poco 15:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Canelés bordelais. --DimiTalen 08:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Place du Bronze, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium. --DimiTalen 08:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Left valve of a Lyrate Asiatic Hard Clam, Meretrix lyrata --Llez 07:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dresdner Eierschecke (by Brücke-Osteuropa) --RudolfSchreier 07:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Oppose Too noisy, poor focus and crop --A.Savin 15:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Sculpture of Saints Cyril and Methodius (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Statue of Saint John the Baptist and St Vitus Cathedral (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Statue of Saint John the Baptist (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Statue of Saint John the Baptist Detail (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Sculpture of Saints Norbert, Wenceslaus and Sigismund (Prague) --Scotch Mist 07:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Too much chroma noise and need for an adjustment of aspect ratio --Poco a poco 15:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done Adjusted aspect ratio and colour balance --Scotch Mist 17:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  You went too far with the aspect ratio, now it looks the other way around --Poco a poco 20:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Tower van Spannenburg next to the Prinses Margriet Canal
  --Famberhorst 06:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion I know this tower, good quality --Michielverbeek 06:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  Ik zag dat je er geweest bent. Hier is het bewijs. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spannenburg,_de_toren_van_Spannenburg_IMG_2678a_2018-04-19_15.04.jpg --Famberhorst 06:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Building at Carrer del Bisbe Torras i Bages 6 in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Edifici de la Llotja in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Saint Teresa church in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Roman temple in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Portal of the church of Pieta in Vic, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Traditional barn at Waltensburg/Vuorz.
- Promotion --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz, Switzerland. Ruin Casti Mint Sorn Gieri (Burg Jörgenberg) and surroundings.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Alp da Schlans 1760m. Mountain lake Lag da Schlans.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Citrine Wagtail --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose no definition --Charlesjsharp 16:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Charlesjsharp: I didn't get it. Can you explain more about it ? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Niagara Falls --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Niagara Falls --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The Presto Card Reader --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Autumn leaves on the pond at the main entrance of the wildlife park in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Forest in the Baumberge (Baumberge nature reserve, COE-074), Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Mind-blowing Exposure --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cathedral in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Tower “Lange Jan” of the Nieuwe Kerk in Middelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Groynes at the beach, Zoutelande, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Randolph Theatre --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Flowers blooming outside Dunvegan Castle during summer. By User:老陳 --Q28 04:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Central Park Mall, By User:Ingfbruno --Q28 04:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Neptune Fountain side view. --Rjcastillo 04:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Mapocho sculpture. --Rjcastillo 04:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality, inspite of the low light and high ISO --Tagooty 04:14, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination 2020 Beijing Sizhong, located at Beijing Overpass. By User:Wcr1993 --Q28 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: WDPA under the IDEnglish: Angelica morrisonicola in Hehuan Mountain. By User:潘麗峰 --Q28 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Views at Anhui Huangshan. By User:Miaulian --Q28 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Nice motif. Sorry, not sharp enough. It looks like downsized too. --XRay 05:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Hotel Astoria, former Villa Holbein on Annastraße #43, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Terrace of Hotel Astoria on Annastraße #43, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Loggia of the second floor on the southern facade of Hotel Astoria on Annastraße #43, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Strandcasino Werzer on Werzerpromenade #10, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Werzer’s boathouse on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 19, 2023[edit]

- Nomination Archbishop Ganguli Building --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Strange red spots all over the image. I´m not sure if this are hot pixels but that problem must be fixed before you upload more images. Sorry. --Ermell 09:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Ermell: Actually these pictures were taken almost 1 year ago also in JPEG format. I have tried a bit to improve it. How is it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The Parliament of Canada --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose A lot of hot pixels, too noisy, the perspective should be corrected, the clone stamp error fixed and the CA removed. Sorry. --Ermell 09:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Ermell: Tried to fix it as per your instructions, is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Fairmont Le Château Frontenac --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Oppose Burnt sky. Sorry. --Ermell 09:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  @Ermell: Thanks for the rreview. Tried to fix it is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: No. 8A on Bulevardul Aviatorilor, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 8A on Bulevardul Aviatorilor, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 9 on Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 9 on Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 15 on Bulevardul Primăverii, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Fiat Scudo in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 19:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Opel Movano C in Esslingen.--Alexander-93 19:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion A bit tight at right but Good quality. --Cayambe 17:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Remains of the east stoa of ancient Thermo. --C messier 19:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The church of Saint Tryphon, Vytina. --C messier 19:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Church of the Nativity of Mary in Vytina. --C messier 19:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality, nice composition --FlocciNivis 09:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View of Dimitsana. --C messier 19:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View of the Clock Tower of Dimitsana. --C messier 19:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Street in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 19:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The corner of Sansome Street and Sutter Street in San Francisco at night. --Frank Schulenburg 18:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Saint Michael the Archangel --Boaventuravinicius 18:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Gurabija (гурабија,Qurabiya) --PetarM 18:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Yellow pencil whit eraser --Boaventuravinicius 18:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Too noisy. Better lighting should have been used --FlocciNivis 09:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Aston Martin Vantage F1 Edition in Filderstadt.--Alexander-93 17:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Suzuki Jimny in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 17:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Volkswagen ID. Buzz in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 17:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Lemon sorbet with peppermint leaves (Mentha × piperita)
  --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ice cubes in Aperol Spritz
  --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Nothing is really sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 09:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Stuffed toy in the birth center of the “Marienhaus Klinikum Hetzelstift“
  --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: A Common Kestrel up in the air near power lines --FlocciNivis 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination A lone kestrel on a power line --FlocciNivis 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: View from the South along the Saar to Saarburg --FlocciNivis 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Can more character be revealed in the shaded portion of the image? --Scotch Mist 18:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
$* Nomination View from the South along the Saar to Saarburg --FlocciNivis 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC) * Promotion Support Would probably have cropped image for more focus on town\buildings but good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)$
- Nomination View from the South along the Saar to Saarburg --FlocciNivis 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Would probably have cropped image for more focus on town\buildings but good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View from the other side of the Saar to the vineyard Würtzberg --FlocciNivis 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Capitoline she-wolf, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Sculpture Leone che attacca un cavallo, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bust of Minerva, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ancient Roman relief, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  I don't know why the bottom looks blurry, also there's some noise maybe. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  I reworked it --Poco a poco 21:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support It's much better thank you. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ancient roman statue of Titus, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 16:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  There's a bit noise in the shadows. It's easily removable. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  Didn't look to me like a must given the file size, but I applied some denoising --Poco a poco 21:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support It's much better thank you. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Old town of Split, Croatia --MB-one 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Tour boat Svantevit in the Port of Ribnitz --MB-one 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Tilted in cw direction --Poco a poco 16:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: VW T3 Doka Syncro --MB-one 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  QI to me if you crop the chunk of car on the left side --Poco a poco 16:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Hortulus du musée du Vieux Pérouges in Pérouges, France. --Cayambe 14:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Souvenir from Gramado-RS, Brazil and Gramado Cinema Festival --Boaventuravinicius 14:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Parking lot with Quercus rubra in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 12:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Two cars on a slope rue de la Talaudière in fr:Saint-Étienne. --Touam 11:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  It looks overprocessed to me --Poco a poco 16:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Convertible hall in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 10:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Convertible hall in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 10:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Staircase in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 10:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Cash machine in the Atrium shopping center in Bamberg --Ermell 10:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bibra castle --Ermell 10:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Jesus Crucifix (Prague) --Scotch Mist 08:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Can you remove the sculpture from the left bottom also correct the perspective a bit? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  The grieving face of Mary could be readily cropped but IMO that would diminish the composition - where do you think the perspective should be adjusted? --Scotch Mist 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Statue of St Anne and St Vitus Cathedral (Prague) --Scotch Mist 08:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Statue of St Anne (Prague) --Scotch Mist 08:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Sculpture of Saints Cyril and Methodius with Plinth (Prague) --Scotch Mist 08:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Sculpture of Saints Cyril and Methodius Detail (Prague) --Scotch Mist 08:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bench in Parc Heurtebise, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 08:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ferme du Bocquiau, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 08:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Open wing basking position of Lexias cyanipardus (Butler, (1869)) - Great Archduke (female) (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 07:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Right valve of a Lyrate Asiatic Hard Clam, Meretrix lyrata --Llez 07:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination A plate of dorayaki and sweet potato from Kashiwa, Tokyo, Japan. By User:Rachmat04 --RudolfSchreier 06:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Not by a Wikimedian. --Gyrostat 13:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  Oppose Thanks for the Decline(s) - totally my screw-up! I did not expect QInominator to even nominate images by non-Wikimedians. --RudolfSchreier 14:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Taiyaki. By User:田村義邦 --RudolfSchreier 06:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Comment Dubious status: the uploader has only three edits, which are three uploads, by three different cameras. Suspecting copyvio. --Gyrostat 13:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Berliner Philharmonie's Hall. By User:StrangeTraveler --RudolfSchreier 06:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Not by a Wikimedian. --Gyrostat 13:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Saucisson. By User:Varaine --RudolfSchreier 06:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Not by a Wikimedian. --Gyrostat 13:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination A buko pie. By User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) --RudolfSchreier 05:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Not by a Wikimedian. --Gyrostat 13:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz. View from the road next to the Vorderrhein at Waltensburg/Vuorz railway station to the outside of Ruïne Burg Kropfenstein (Casti Grotta)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Chapel Sogn Carli. View (from Kapelle Sogn Carli) on the clouds above the mountains on the south side of the valley.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Kapelle St. Jakob/Caplutta Sogn Giacun. Breil-Brigels. (Detail of interior.)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Onyar river in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Tower of the Convent of Sisters Vetlladores in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Saint Dominic convent in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View of the Saint Martin church in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Twin tower of the Sacred Heart church in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 05:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cathedral in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Female sculpture on the Santa Lucía hill. --Rjcastillo 03:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 18, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Haugesund City Hall (in Norwegian: "Haugesund rådhus"), the town hall of Haugesund municipality in Rogaland county, Norway. Distorted panoramic photo taken in June 2020 showing the town hall, the "Rådhusplassen" square, the "Rådhusparken" park, with flowerbeds, benches and sculptures, surrounding streets and buildings, among them Haugaland District Court ("Haugaland tingrett"), Western Norway University of Applied Sciences ("Høgskulen på Vestlandet"), etc. By User:Wolfmann --Q28 02:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Water tower in Vyborg, Russia. --Красный 23:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ruins of the stable in Peterhof, Russia. --Красный 23:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Valkealampi lake photographed from above. Pitkyarantsky district, Karelia, Russia. --Красный 23:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Singer house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Красный 23:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. You can improve the quality with a smaller aperture significantly --Ermell 21:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Sforza's Castle (Mian) - Torrione del Carmine --Terragio67 22:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 12:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Defensive tower named Rocchetta di Piazza. Cesena, Emilia Romagna, Italy. --Terragio67 22:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Church of Saint Tryphon, Vytina. --C messier 20:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination View of Dimitsana. --C messier 20:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Dacia Spring in Esslingen.--Alexander-93 20:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: DFSK Fengon 5 in Esslingen.--Alexander-93 20:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz GLC in Esslingen.--Alexander-93 18:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Volkswagen Caddy V Maxi in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 18:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View from Marayon Thong Hill. --RockyMasum 17:05, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  The noise should be reduced --Ermell 20:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: The mushroom-shaped kiosk in Lindau am Bodensee --FlocciNivis 15:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View from the Äußere Cramer-Klett-Street to the St. Josef church in Nuremberg --FlocciNivis 15:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Aphids on himalayan balsam --FlocciNivis 15:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View to the former administration building of the butchery in Sulzbach/Saar --FlocciNivis 15:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Souvenir of Brasília-DF, Brazil --Boaventuravinicius 15:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: 15 impasse garibaldi à en:Saint-Étienne, France --Touam 11:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The narrow streets of Sirmione --Liridon 10:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The narrow streets of Sirmione--Liridon 10:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sirmione Castle --Liridon 10:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The narrow streets of Sirmione --Liridon 10:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sirmione Castle --Liridon 10:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  PC is needed (the tower is e.g. leaning). Also a more detailed description would be nice --FlocciNivis 15:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Calvary Statue Crucifix (Prague) --Scotch Mist 09:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  I like the composition, but in my opinion a few more pixels on the bottom would improve this image. Is this possible? --FlocciNivis 15:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done Thank you for your review - does this newly-loaded image reflect the change you had in mind? --Scotch Mist 19:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Art object in the garden of the International Artists' House Villa Concordia --Ermell 09:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ancient roman mask, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 07:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ceiling of the salon ovale de la princesse in the Hôtel de Soubise --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Salon ovale de la princesse in the Hôtel de Soubise --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Magazine of the holy synod, an example of Romanian Revival graphic design, from March —Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: 15 Bulevardul Primăverii, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: 15 Bulevardul Primăverii, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 07:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  There are some dust spots (I count 3) above the building that need to be removed --FlocciNivis 15:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 17, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Kippenheim-Germany, church: the Friedenskirche --Michielverbeek 19:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Moving nomination here, I found it in the gallery for 25th December but it wasn't showing due to the filename having someone's signature in the middle of it. --Mike Peel 20:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Pancho Lasso: Monument for The Internationale (to the Music) --Mike Peel 20:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ein Murmeltier im Zoo von Neumünster. --Nightflyer 20:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Stone mansion in Vytina, Arcadia. --C messier 19:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Die Kirche in Elsterheide. -- Nightflyer 19:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Chestnut Tailed Starling --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose no definition --Charlesjsharp 16:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Common Myna --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose no definition --Charlesjsharp 16:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Volvo XC60 (Facelift) in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: 4 variété de crocus, 4 variety of crocus --Paulparadis 15:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Chai Phattanasilp Building, Bangkok --Chainwit. 13:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Saphan Phittaya Sathien, Bangkok --Chainwit. 13:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Padmasana at Pura Ulun Danu Bratan --Chainwit. 13:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia --Chainwit. 13:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: East Asiatic Company Building, Bangkok --Chainwit. 13:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes)
- Nomination: Coverpage of Hortus Malabaricus engraved on stone in Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India --Shishirdasika 12:52, 17 January, 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: A disassembled automobile engine on display at museum in Ohio.--Nheyob 12:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination A supercar engine on display at a museum in Ohio.--Nheyob 12:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 21:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Building no. 4 Intrarea Dacilor, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 12:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building no. 4 Intrarea Dacilor, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 12:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 2 Strada Termopile, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 12:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 2 Strada Termopile, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 12:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building no. 1 on Intrarea Spătarului, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 12:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House at the upper Stephansberg --Ermell 11:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: "Wilde Rose Bräu Keller", former "Leicht Keller" --Ermell 11:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View from the bridge of the Lilienthalallee on the combined heat and power plant Freimann --FlocciNivis 10:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Flaminio obelisk, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 09:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Maria Column Sculpture (Prague) --Scotch Mist 08:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Awkward angle, what is the black item? an umbrella? it is very distracting --Poco a poco 10:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  Good Question! There appears to be a pair of 'copper wings' protruding from the base of the statue and with only one 'wing' evident perhaps there is less-distraction from the details above and below! --Scotch Mist 10:45, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Indeed, it belongs to the sculpture --Poco a poco 16:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Common Iora --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed

January 16, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Bees at the entrance of their hive in the Deutsch-Französischer Garten - --FlocciNivis 19:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View from the Karolinger Brücke on the Saar and the power station Völklingen-Fenne --FlocciNivis 19:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Would suggest cropping to reduce or remove uninteresting portions of the image such as the large shaded area --Scotch Mist 09:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done, I cropped the dark area away --FlocciNivis 22:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Wood of the Montreynaud park in winter at Saint-Étienne. --Touam 13:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 9 on Strada Gherghe Manu, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 42 on Strada Justiției, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 42 on Strada Justiției, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed

January 15, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Cave Gemeentegrot in Valkenburg, Netherlands, with Christmas-Market --Superbass 21:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The enclosure wall of ancient Thermo. --C messier 19:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Consecration plaque of 2006 in Iglesia de Ntra. Sra. de la Paz in Puerto de la Cruz in Tenerife. --Cayambe 14:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Old Town Square At Night (Prague) --Scotch Mist 11:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House Alter Graben 1 in Bamberg --Ermell 11:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House at the upper Stephansberg 20 in Bamberg --Ermell 11:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Via della Scala, Trastevere, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 11:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Alfa Romeo Tonale in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 10:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 42 on Strada Justiției, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building no. 29 on Calea Victoriei, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 2 on Strada Profesorilor, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: House no. 2 on Strada Arthur Verona, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Seattle skyline from the Jose Rizal Bridge, U.S. --Another Believer 05:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Jose P. Rizal Park, Seattle, U.S. --Another Believer 05:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: St. James Cathedral, Seattle, U.S. --Another Believer 05:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Michelin direction road sign to Le Raincy along Général de Gaulle street, Montfermeil. --Chabe01 00:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Tilted CW --Tagooty 05:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 14, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Fiscal Island, Brazil --Boaventuravinicius 20:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Rather pale. Check check the white balance. --Milseburg 11:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC) Comment Now size is too small. Meta data missing. --Milseburg 16:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: A fruit in a tree --Boaventuravinicius 19:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  You can not promote your own nomination. --C messier 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Please check the category. Also, it doesn't look really sharp. --C messier 20:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Sorry --Boaventuravinicius 20:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Ice in unusual use --Boaventuravinicius 19:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC) You can not promote your own nomination. --C messier 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Sorry --Boaventuravinicius 20:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Scene from a roller derby jam in Berlin 2018 --MB-one 18:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Picturesque view of Rue Girardon in Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment Please remember to sign your nominations so that we know who we provide feedback to and we know the date and time they have been published. Also, please remember to nominate no more than 5 images per day. I'd suggest to withdraw 4 of the 9 nominations and publish them tomorrow. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Gate of no. 9 in Rond-point des Champs-Élysées-Marcel-Dassault, Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Door of no. 35 on Rue Étienne-Marcel, Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ceiling of the stairs hall in the Suțu Palace --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Peristyle of the Grand Trianon --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Stone vase in the Gardens of the Palace of Versailles --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Neoclassical palmettes of the fence of the Panthéon in Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building no. 15 on Avenue de l'Opéra, Paris --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Interior of the Salon du glacier in the Opéra Garnier --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Comment See notice above. --Lion-hearted85 19:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Neoclassical interior of the Louvre --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 20:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Relic of St Vincent in Our Lady Cathedral (Sedlec) --Scotch Mist 11:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The St. Ottilien station on a foggy day --FlocciNivis 10:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Entrance to Castillo de El Tostón, Fuerteventura --Mike Peel 09:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Row houses, Rue Saint Charles 90 and 92, in Marquette-lez-Lille, France --Velvet 08:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Stairs at Catete Palace, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil-- 04:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Review needed

January 13, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Headquarters of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights --Rjcastillo 19:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  I'm really missing the bottom. Is it possible to get the full staircase in the photo? --C messier 21:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Neptune Fountain on the Terrace of Cerro Santa Lucía. --Rjcastillo 19:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  The right side looks more cropped, can you make the both sides same? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC)̪
  DoneThanks for the suggestion. --Rjcastillo 06:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cloître monastère San Lazzaro décembre 2022. --Benoît Prieur 19:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose IMHO, too soft (strong NR?) --C messier 20:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Havlíčkův Brod Base Sculptures of Plague Column in Main Square --Scotch Mist 12:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Unfortunate crop. In the lower left parts of the image are missing (probably after horizontal alligning). The top of the sculpture is dropped. Portrait format would have been more favorable. --Zinnmann 14:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
  Done Thanks for review - restored lower left part of image - crop of tall column was deliberate so as to focus on base sculptures and surround! --Scotch Mist 23:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The death march cenotaph in Obermenzing --FlocciNivis 10:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Information board of planned public events in Eckernförde. Some have already been cancelled due to the Covid-19 pandemic --MB-one 08:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Unfavorable perspective and cropping, fixable? --F. Riedelio 08:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 12, 2023[edit]

- Nomination Abandoned Kaula-Kotselvaara Nickel Mine. --Alexander Novikov 11:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination La mairie et l'église de Pregny-Chambésy.JPG --Jérémy Toma 11:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Perspective correction needed. --Milseburg 14:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Not done --Milseburg 20:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The city hall of Saarbrücken seen from the Betzenstraße --FlocciNivis 09:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ampittia subvittatus (Moore, 1878) - Tiger Hopper. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Bodhisattwa 06:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Aleksandr Grin in Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 06:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality, I like those two seagulls as a detail --FlocciNivis 16:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination This mute swan --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 11, 2023[edit]

- Nomination Nave of the oldest Catholic church building in New England. --Nheyob 21:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Pagani Zonda Chassis No. 001 at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 19:51, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Central Golden Hall, Kofuku-ji --Chainwit. 17:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Sorry: IMO not sharp enough for QI, photograph of identifiable people {{Personality rights}}. --F. Riedelio 17:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination South Octagonal Hall, Kofuku-ji --Chainwit. 17:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View from the Petersberg over Rhenish Hesse and Bechtolsheim northward to the Taunus --Milseburg 17:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Question QI?--Milseburg 16:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Image fusion process (two images) of a Wooden crucifix XVI sec - Chiesa San Giovanni Battista - Gradara Marche Italy (in order to have more details). --Terragio67 17:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 10, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Vyborg fortress, drone picture --Красный 15:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Comment Try to correct the perspective. --A.Savin 15:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination A cathedral in Ontario, Canada. --Nheyob 13:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Can you denoise the sky.?? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  Good advice. I hope this works.--Nheyob 12:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 9, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Fontana dei fiumi, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 11:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  The lower part of the fountain sculptures is cropped. Fixable? --C messier 20:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  That wouldn't really help, lots of people around... --Poco a poco 10:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 8, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Bhopal Junction new buildingI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 15:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  The right part building is leaning to the left. --C messier 19:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

January 5, 2023[edit]

January 4, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Kallina Ratha of the Vittala Temple, 14th century. Hampi, Karnataka, India. --Argenberg 11:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Needs tilt/perspective correction. --C messier 20:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  I have corrected the tilt. Feel free to revert if there is anything wrong. GrandEscogriffe 22:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  It also needs perspective correction (tight side leaning in). --C messier 19:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:20220802_Polistes_dominula_02.jpg[edit]

Nomination An European Paper Wasp on a flower --FlocciNivis 09:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose shadow underneath wasp. Are you sure of id? --Charlesjsharp 16:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Canada_Goose,_Toronto_11.jpg[edit]

Nomination Canada Goose --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose There are quite a lot of violet CAs, e.g. around the head, beak, underside, feet and the concrete. --BigDom 15:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
@BigDom: Thanks for the review, I fixed it. I don't know how it came even in the original picture. Can you help me out?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:At_Icod_de_los_Vinos_2022_073.jpg[edit]

Nomination Chicken at Parque del Drago, Tenerife --Mike Peel 20:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose not very sharp --Charlesjsharp 16:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Common_Iora,_Khulna_03.jpg[edit]

Nomination Common Iora --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose not enough detail/sharpness --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
@Charlesjsharp: Thanks for the opinion, I tried to improve it Is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Fabian, if you present a bird to QI it should have detail. You were too far away (or you needed more mm) to achieve that Poco a poco 16:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: Thanks for the opinion Diego. I'll keep it in mind. Actually the bird was too small and I had a 70-300mm. It was taken at 300mm.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Charles. Also too noisy, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 22:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20210425_Apis_mellifera_02.jpg[edit]

Nomination Bees at the entrance of their hive in the Deutsch-Französischer Garten --FlocciNivis 19:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose the bee in the foreground --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The out of focus bee in the foreground is quite distracting. --C messier 20:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Monkeys_of_The_Sundarbans_13.jpg[edit]

Nomination Rhesus Monkey --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose cropped fingers --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough/too noisy for QI. I know that's a tough standard. -- Ikan Kekek 22:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Worked a bit on it. Is it ok now? Also, their fur looks blurry in the original. If this version doesn't work out, and also if you want I can give you the main pic so you can help me with the edit.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The animal's fur isn't inherently blurry. It's hard to take sharp wildlife photos. Charles may have some advice for you. -- Ikan Kekek 17:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jeune_qui_souffre.jpg[edit]

Nomination The 115 patrol (see SAMU social) should find him. --Touam 15:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Jeune? personality rights? invasion of privacy --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment OK for personality rights, I've put it. For "jeune", it is his expression. For invasion of privacy, what ?... are we in his kitchen ? --Touam (talk) 11:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Good portrait for me. Not sure it's an invasion of privacy, he appears to be at least somewhat posing for the photo. BigDom 19:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Seems fine to me, and we should assume good faith on Touam's part. -- Ikan Kekek 17:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:JNTBGRI_mother_earth.jpg[edit]

Nomination Statue of mother earth at JNTBGRI in Thiruvananthapuram,India --Shishirdasika 19:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose too dark --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
I think the darkness can be fixed ? Try to work with it a bit. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wood_Duck,_Highpark_38.jpg[edit]

Nomination The Wood Duck --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Quite noisy (as expected from the high ISO) and a bit posterisation at the legs. Fixable? --C messier 20:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)@C messier: Tried to fixed it. Is it better now?
Oppose noise --Charlesjsharp 16:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
@Charlesjsharp: Tried to improve it, how is it now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Better but loss of definition. Thing on the right detracts. Charlesjsharp 16:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Support ΙΜΗΟ, it is OK for QI. --C messier 20:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Lovely colours and mood. Quality good enough. --Tagooty 04:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Acceptable as an overall composition, per others. -- Ikan Kekek 17:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Middelburg_(NL),_Nieuwe_Kerk,_Abdijplein,_Skulptur_--_2022_--_4914.jpg[edit]

Nomination Sculpture “The Unveiling” (Sjuul Joosen, 2016) in the courtyard of the Nieuwe Kerk in Middelburg, Zeeland, Netherlands --XRay 04:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I think it's oddly cropped. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The sculpture itself is not cropped, sharpness, exposure and colours are good. --Smial 10:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question Is the thing in front a cannon that predated the sculpture? -- Ikan Kekek 17:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My impression was that the sculpture and the cannon are from different eras. The modern part can be seen completely, of the historical cannon only the relevant part. Quite apart from this, I have often taken sections of sculptures and presented them here. I don't quite understand the discussion. If I were to nominate at VI, it would be understandable to see everything. Here I see the cutout as photographic freedom. --XRay 18:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Deers_of_Sundarbans_17.jpg[edit]

Nomination Spotted Deer --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
There are weird pink spots on the top. --C messier 13:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)@C messier: Corrected, Thank you--Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose poor crop. Charlesjsharp 16:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Charles, seems like a pretty random composition, sorry. BigDom 19:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Deers_of_Sundarbans_11.jpg[edit]

Nomination Spotted Deer --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose There are weird pink artifacts next to the antlers and the deer behind the one on the foreground. --C messier 13:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)@C messier: Corrected, Thank you--Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
There is one more and one stamp is quite noticable. --C messier 20:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose crop. Charlesjsharp 17:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support A bit of a tight crop on the antler, but as a portrait of the face, I think this works. BigDom 19:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, I tried to take a portrait. I'm also sorry for the crop on the antler, I'll keep it in mind. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Top crop is a no-go for me, sorry --Poco a poco 19:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The background is too present and distracting for this to work as a portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 17:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Turmfalke_P1320437.jpg[edit]

Nomination Turmfalke auf Sitzwarte.--Fischer.H 14:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Comment No cats have been added --Poco a poco 16:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Btw, not sure why this nom ended up in this section, it wasn't me who moved it and I don't think it was necessary --Poco a poco 18:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose for now. No categories and no location, not even an approximate one. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rarotonga,_Club_Raro_Resort_stairs_into_ocean.jpg[edit]

Nomination A view of stairs into water on Rarotonga island. --Sleeps-Darkly 22:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Oppose for now: Obviously tilted horizon. -- Ikan Kekek 05:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Ikan Kekek: Please take a closer look: the issue is a messed up cache on Commons that I can't purge, the horizon was fixed way before your comment. --Sleeps-Darkly 08:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Support It seems okay in the last version to my eyes. Nice scene and good quality. Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Looks good to me. BigDom 19:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment It still looks slightly tilted to me, but when I measured it with a tape measure, it seemed at least close to straight if not actually straight, so I will take no view on that and defer to the others. -- Ikan Kekek 18:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Ikan Kekek 18:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Galata_tower_01_23.jpg[edit]

Nomination Galata tower, Istanbul. --GrandEscogriffe 20:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Sammandi 05:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Sky in upper part is very noisy, no QI for me this way. --A.Savin 15:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@A.Savin: the sky is smoother now. --GrandEscogriffe 13:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, but you have strong denoising now. Look at the tower, it's totally soft. --A.Savin 02:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I denoised only the upper part of the sky. The tower is the same in the two versions. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 09:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --A.Savin 02:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Basílica_de_Santa_María_Novella,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-19,_DD_45.jpg[edit]

Nomination Santa Maria Novella, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 15:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
~~Oppose~~ IMHO, tilted CW and the right side is leaning out. --C messier 21:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fixed Poco a poco 19:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support OK. --C messier 20:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Ikan Kekek 17:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mauritian_flying_fox_(Pteropus_niger)_in_flight_3.jpg[edit]

Nomination Mauritian flying fox (Pteropus niger) --Charlesjsharp 15:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Oppose There are halos around the bat. --C messier 19:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per messier. --Palauenc05 22:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Sorry, this is certainly a valuable image, but given the relatively low resolution, too blurry for QIC even for a wildlife photo. The strong post-processing is no salvation here. --Smial 13:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Blurry-- Wasiul Bahar 18:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wat_Ku_วัดกู้_--_พระอุโบถสถหลังเดิม.jpg[edit]

Nomination Wat Ku: the old ubosot --Chainwit. 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Needs perspective correction. --C messier 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 05:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose Perspective correction not done. --C messier 20:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose per C messier. BigDom 19:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --BigDom 19:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:วัดแสงแก้วโพธิญาณ_Wat_Saeng_Kaew_Phothiyan_main_building.jpg[edit]

Nomination Wat Saeng Kaew Phothiyan --Chainwit. 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Comment Needs perspective correction. --C messier 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 05:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Perspective correction not done. --C messier 20:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Шманьківці,_Нічлава,_Фоторобота_Максима_Огородника_«Паморозь_у_верболозах».jpg[edit]

Nomination Winter river--Максим Огородник 15:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Comment Quite prominent green and purple CAs. A geolocation would be welcomed too. --C messier 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 05:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The prominent CAs have not been fixed. --C messier 20:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Messier, also there's much grain --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Peulle 08:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Partido_Radical_de_Chile.jpg[edit]

Nomination Radical Party of Chile. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed sky creates a very strong halo. --Gyrostat 18:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Per Gyrostat --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Gyrostat. BigDom 11:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per others. On top of that, some parts on top of the roof have taken on the color of the blue sky. Very strange. --Smial 12:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose as above --Sandro Halank 20:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per above, clearly visible at thumbnail size --Poco a poco 16:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

* Oppose I have to agree. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose per others --Milseburg 11:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Looking at the blue fading into the building, it seems that the sky doesn't belong to the original shot. I'd suggest to restore the original one, as the overall quality of the rest of the picture is good. --Lion-hearted85 13:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
New version-Thanks for the review and suggestions. It was my mistake.I had lost the original file. --Rjcastillo (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
@Rjcastillo: It's pretty much better now, I'm happy to Support.But I think it will be difficult to overturn all of these votes in a short period. I would rather suggest you nominate it again.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment I wouldn't overturn my vote, the sky is washed out now. Was it a fake sky in the first version? that would be a bold nom for QI --Poco a poco 15:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Good quality to me: the sky often looks just like that. But this issue should be addressed. -- Ikan Kekek 17:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Decline? --Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ship_spotted_in_The_Sundarban_12.jpg[edit]

Nomination Ship spotted near The Sundarbans --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Photo is not categorized correctly. --Mike1979 Russia 13:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review Mike1979 Russia, I have changed the category of the picture, let me know if there's anything more I can do--Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Wasiul Bahar 15:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Ship categorized by she's name. Please, see Category:Ships --Mike1979 Russia 06:23, 10 January 2023
@Mike1979 Russia: Can you please explain further, I couldn't get you? If you meant ship's name , I'm not sure because these are the small ships that mainly travel through the rivers. Also, I couldn't find a category with the name thats written on the ship. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 06:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)(UTC)Reply[reply]

@Fabian Roudra Baroi: You should create ship's category with her name according rules. Info about ship you can find in inland maritime authorities of Bangladesh. But I can't help you in searching because I don't undestand begali. --Mike1979 Russia (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
@Mike1979 Russia: Thanks, for the suggestions. I almost searched for more than 3 years in the govt. websites, I found the list for international water but not the inland. Would you be able to assist me in a meeting ?--Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Too dark, unfortunate crop (too much of the grey sky), and the ship should be identified (IMO No.) --Palauenc05 09:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
@Palauenc05: Done Thanks for the review, I reedited the picture according to your review. Also, these are the domestic ships which only travel through domestic rivers, I'm not sure if they have IMO or not. Can you please give me more details? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Overprocessed. Blurred and oversharpened at the same time. Editing the tonal values increased the image noise and led to additional artifacts. --Smial 12:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
@Smial: Thanks for the review. I uploaded another version with reduced grain, the shutter speed of this picture is 1/1000 so its sharp also a little bit grainy. I used a higher shutter speed because I was in a moving boat so lower shutter speed could have made it blurry. Also, I was not in a parallel line with the ship and I focused on the front of the ship, thats why the front is totally sharp and the back is a little blurry because of the focal point being a little bit far from the back of the ship and also because of using a zoom lens. Please check the first of the pic thats the raw one, then you wont think I over processed cause I just increased the contrast as the picture was little hazy due to heavy fog. Please let me know for any more changes and where did you see the artificats? I will try to recover them. It happens because of the damage in my dslr sensor. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Sorry, I actually like the composition and the mood but I agree with Smial, it seems like noise reduction has been overused which has led to a sort of smudgy look, and then tried to pull this back with the sharpness slider. A bit of noise/grain isn't necessarily an issue, definitely preferable to overprocessing IMO. BigDom 11:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @BigDom: I really appreciate it, can you please check the first version that I uploaded. Thats the raw one and guide me what edits should be done on that.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 15:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - I honestly think your current version is pretty good, the colours etc on the boat seem OK to me (they're always going to a bit muted due to the misty weather) and the focus is fine. I would have just probably used a little less noise correction, and then it shouldn't need so much additional sharpening. I would maybe crop still more of the sky out than what you've already done too (maybe try a more 'widescreen' aspect ratio like 16:10?). BigDom 16:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    - @BigDom: Thank you so much for the Ratio, it really looks better now. Is the sharpening and noise reduction ok now? Sharpening amount 20 out of 150 and Noise Reduction amount 10 out of 100 in Lightroom. I sharpened it a bit because the back part is little blurry --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    - Comment The very first "RAW" version did not have excessive noise that would bother me. --Smial 11:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      - I think the new version is much better. Happy to Support now. BigDom 14:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment I keep my oppose vote, as the file description is not satisfactory, esp. the identification of the ship (whether it*s domestic or not). See guidelines No. 3: "...an accurate description on the file page". --Palauenc05 13:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
@Palauenc05: I'm trying to find more information, I have searched all of the govt websites. Rather than opposing it would be better if you can help me find--Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment @ Fabian Roudra Baroi: My oppose vote doesn't play a role anyway, as the majority supports that nomination, although an important criterion is not fulfilled. I can't help you much in this case as I'm not an expert on ships. However, you should at least mention the information you have, such as the name of the ship and its (registration?) number. If it helps you, I can then scratch my vote. --Palauenc05 16:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
@Palauenc05: Thank you so much. I'm not sure about its registration, I'll try to input as much as I can see from the ship itself.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment I added the name of the ship as it appears at the bow, but I couldn't find its IMO (maybe it doesn't have one). --C messier 13:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
@C messier: Thank you so much I appreciate it. I almost researched for more than 3 hours on Ship-related govt. websites and lists. I found the international ship list but only the statistics for inland ships. Also, there's a 5digit no at the bow I tried to research about it on google couldn't find anything --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment I've added the ship owner company, too. --Palauenc05 12:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Good enough, per others. -- Ikan Kekek 20:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Ikan Kekek 20:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Saltwater_Crocodiles_of_Sundarbans_03.jpg[edit]

Nomination Saltwater Crocodiles of Sundarbans --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Looks overprocessed to me and please, don't overcategorize, see COM:OVERCAT --Poco a poco 11:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done Thanks for the review @Poco a poco, I have adjusted the category, also I removed my texture editing and reduced the sharpness and vibrance. Let me know if any more changes needed to be done.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An improvement, specially looking at the teeth but the texture of the skin still looks overprocessed --Poco a poco 20:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: New version uploaded. I mainly played with lights, whites, blacks and sharpness. In lightroom, I've decreased the whites, shadows and increased the blacks. Also increased the sharpness and noise reduction. Let me know what should be changed. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not really an improvement to me, sorry Poco a poco 15:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Poco a poco: IT would be better if you suggest me what settings should I change rather than just saying not an improvement. Also, Thats the natural skin of that crocodile with little mud on its face and body. If you want I can send you the raw picture.

Not so easy, there are different reasons why an image could look overprocessed, I don't know what settings you have used here. I can offer to give it a try if you send me the RAW file. Poco a poco 09:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Poco a poco: I really appreciate, it would be my honor to learn from you. Kindly please check the mail that you attached with your userpage.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Good quality. -- Wasiul Bahar 18:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info Uploaded a new version edited by @Poco a poco--Fabian Roudra Baroi ( talk) 20:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]

Fri 13 Jan → Sat 21 Jan
Sat 14 Jan → Sun 22 Jan
Sun 15 Jan → Mon 23 Jan
Mon 16 Jan → Tue 24 Jan
Tue 17 Jan → Wed 25 Jan
Wed 18 Jan → Thu 26 Jan
Thu 19 Jan → Fri 27 Jan
Fri 20 Jan → Sat 28 Jan
Sat 21 Jan → Sun 29 Jan

Commons:Quality images candidates

Purpose[edit]

Guidelines[edit]

For nominators[edit]

Image page requirements[edit]

Creator[edit]

Technical requirements[edit]

Resolution[edit]

Image quality[edit]

Composition and lighting[edit]

Value[edit]

How to nominate[edit]

Number of nominations[edit]

Evaluating images[edit]

How to review[edit]

Grace period and promotion[edit]

How to execute decision[edit]

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Consensual review process[edit]

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

Consensual review rules[edit]

Nominations[edit]

January 21, 2023[edit]

January 20, 2023[edit]

January 20, 2023[edit]

January 19, 2023[edit]

January 18, 2023[edit]

January 17, 2023[edit]

January 16, 2023[edit]

January 15, 2023[edit]

January 14, 2023[edit]

January 13, 2023[edit]

January 12, 2023[edit]

January 11, 2023[edit]

January 10, 2023[edit]

January 9, 2023[edit]

January 8, 2023[edit]

January 5, 2023[edit]

January 4, 2023[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

File:20220802_Polistes_dominula_02.jpg[edit]

File:Canada_Goose,_Toronto_11.jpg[edit]

File:At_Icod_de_los_Vinos_2022_073.jpg[edit]

File:Common_Iora,_Khulna_03.jpg[edit]

File:20210425_Apis_mellifera_02.jpg[edit]

File:Monkeys_of_The_Sundarbans_13.jpg[edit]

File:Jeune_qui_souffre.jpg[edit]

File:JNTBGRI_mother_earth.jpg[edit]

File:Wood_Duck,_Highpark_38.jpg[edit]

File:Middelburg_(NL),_Nieuwe_Kerk,_Abdijplein,_Skulptur_--_2022_--_4914.jpg[edit]

File:Deers_of_Sundarbans_17.jpg[edit]

File:Deers_of_Sundarbans_11.jpg[edit]

File:Turmfalke_P1320437.jpg[edit]

File:Rarotonga,_Club_Raro_Resort_stairs_into_ocean.jpg[edit]

File:Galata_tower_01_23.jpg[edit]

File:Basílica_de_Santa_María_Novella,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-19,_DD_45.jpg[edit]

File:Mauritian_flying_fox_(Pteropus_niger)_in_flight_3.jpg[edit]

File:Wat_Ku_วัดกู้_--_พระอุโบถสถหลังเดิม.jpg[edit]

File:วัดแสงแก้วโพธิญาณ_Wat_Saeng_Kaew_Phothiyan_main_building.jpg[edit]

File:Шманьківці,_Нічлава,_Фоторобота_Максима_Огородника_«Паморозь_у_верболозах».jpg[edit]

File:Partido_Radical_de_Chile.jpg[edit]

File:Ship_spotted_in_The_Sundarban_12.jpg[edit]

File:Saltwater_Crocodiles_of_Sundarbans_03.jpg[edit]

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]

Navigation menu