User talk:Roy17
歸檔 |
---|
File:Miles Byrne, Irish patriot 1798.jpg"[edit]
Okay, next time I will nominate because of a clearly false licence claim... The Banner (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- In effect, all his four uploads had a wrong licence. As I presume, because the uploader thought that scanning would make it "own work". The Banner (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- @The Banner: thank you! I'd say it could be understandable if you DR the paintings as it's not easy to track down their origins and they look suspicious, but a photo of a person in the 1850s, which can be easily verified via google, can hardly be copyrighted. He claimed it as own work. Either let it be, or you could fix it. If such a file is DR-ed, there're only two outcomes--either wait for someone else to fix it, or the useful file gets deleted.--Roy17 (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Fong Ka Chio 2017.JPG
- File:Iau Teng Pio 2017.JPG
- File:Lao Chi Ngai 2017.JPG
- File:Ma Chi Seng 2017.JPG
- File:Pang Chuan 2017.JPG
- File:Sam Hou Fai voting 2017.jpg
- File:Wu Chou Kit 2017.JPG
- File:Zheng Xiaosong 20181008.jpg
Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Covid-19-curves-graphic-social-v3.gif[edit]
Hi, concerning your review of File:Covid-19-curves-graphic-social-v3.gif [1], may I ask why you think it doesn't violates the copyright policy? The illustration was created by [spinoff]. Even though it is adapted by worked created by others, the theSpinoff has inserted creative elements and nowhere it says that it is freely available for use. Best, Cinadon36 (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Cinadon36: as I read the webpage, I believe the comic is an original work by the three authors credited (the guy, the lady, and the illustration all seem to be original), so I passed it to signal that the commons copy is the exact replica of the webpage one. (Implication: the CCBYSA mark on the gif is not fake but indeed added by the authors themselves.)--Roy17 (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Roy, the SpinOff's graphic is derived from a work by Twitter user Thomas Splettstößer, which is itself derived from various other incarnations, the earliest being apparently this CDC document from 2007. Neither the CDC nor the Splettstößer graphs were released under a CC licence (although Splettstößer does say "feel free to use and share" in his Tweet). The question seems to be whether the graph itself passes the threshold of originality, such that the Spin Off copy would be an illegal copy of the earlier versions. Or if the graph itself is just a generic concept, and it's only the design thereof that is copyrightable. Cheers Amakuru (talk) 23:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Amakuru: it goes back to page 18 of https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11425 ({{PD-USGov}}).--Roy17 (talk) 23:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Roy, the SpinOff's graphic is derived from a work by Twitter user Thomas Splettstößer, which is itself derived from various other incarnations, the earliest being apparently this CDC document from 2007. Neither the CDC nor the Splettstößer graphs were released under a CC licence (although Splettstößer does say "feel free to use and share" in his Tweet). The question seems to be whether the graph itself passes the threshold of originality, such that the Spin Off copy would be an illegal copy of the earlier versions. Or if the graph itself is just a generic concept, and it's only the design thereof that is copyrightable. Cheers Amakuru (talk) 23:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Locomotiva Macuca Blumenau SC (26011111957).jpg[edit]
Copyright status: File:Locomotiva Macuca Blumenau SC (26011111957).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Locomotiva Macuca Blumenau SC (26011111957).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove problem tags[edit]
--Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Well-Informed Optimist: quite the opposite. You are using automated tools to remove a PD tag and insert Remove this line and insert a public domain copyright tag instead special:diff/419293131. There is already a PD tag, which you should be able to see had you not used auto tools and edited blindly.--Roy17 (talk) 12:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Locomotiva Macuca Blumenau SC (26011111957).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Monumento 150 anos de Blumenau Blumenau SC (40882943661).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Parque Vila Germânica Blumenau SC (40175077724).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Starter guide[edit]
Hi, regarding User talk:DejaVu#Some advice for Persian speakers is a good starter guide, I wrote them from scratch myself based on my experience on Commons. I did not translated them from anywhere. Some other users such as Hanooz and Ahmad252 helped too. I now consider Commons my home project, but I wrote them at fawiki in ordrer to absorb more fa-speaking users from there. In my experience, most users get interested in Wikipedia first and then consider contributing to other projects such as Commons.
You said that you wanted to "adapt them". May I ask for what purpose? I mean for general International users of Commons, or for a specific language community? Google translate does a nice job, but I can rectify the errors of machine translation. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: I've seen many users having difficulty understanding some basic copyright restrictions, notably FOP. I find your guide pretty illustrative. I might develop an English version or one in another language when I have time and motivation, maybe next year. :) --Roy17 (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Flag of Hong Kong (Black Bauhinia with wilted petals variant).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wcam (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
hello Roy17, I faced this nonsense speedy deletion, but you was successfully reviewed this file. can I ask some help? Puramyun31 (talk) 04:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Jin Zhong, HK Chinese editor.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wcam (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
File:People's Action Party Singapore logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Robertsky (talk) 09:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Mao's portrait and surveillance cameras at Tiananmen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
shizhao (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
File:示威者於深圳燕子嶺派出所要求放人.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Remitamine.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Riesenrad by night.jpg[edit]
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Riesenrad by night.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Ytoyoda (talk) 02:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
File:IceBreakersCandyDisplay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SCP-2000 02:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Portrait of Songgotu.jpg[edit]
该图片的来源是错误的,我是中国人,非常了解清代只有皇帝才有资格穿黄色的衣服,这张图片应该是乾隆皇帝而不是索额图,来源https://m.baike.com/wiki/帝王画像 这个标题是错误的,如果不更改标题就要更换图片,以符合人物 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Бмхүн (talk • contribs) 18:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:AN/U[edit]
Bidgee (talk) 12:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Excuse me Roy17, can you help me? I faced the unconvincing DR , the nominator does not seem to be familiar with Asian (Japanese, in this case) pop-culture, he/she seems to just assume the uploads have a bad faith. I appealed the claim at the DR page(en:Gravure Idols(ja:グラビアアイドル) are a part of Japanese pop-culture, like models, actresses, etc. so the videos depict their normal businesses and can be used the wikipedia article(s) as I mentioned, as the examples what the models performs. so they can have an educational value like other Japanese pop-cultures. also Commons does not necessarily require its files must be used in other wikimedia projects, because the site is a general media repository files in the website can be used outside anywhere (that's why Commons is a "free" license media site.)), but the nominator strongly maintained his/her arguments. Puramyun31 (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
File:黃英豪2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
CometMoon (talk) 10:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
File:1949之後 右派狗崽子話當年.mp3 (redirect)[edit]
File:1949之後 右派狗崽子話當年.mp3 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Racconish 💬 10:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
File:1949之後 - 右派狗崽子話當年.mp3[edit]
Hello,this file contains an insulting name,and though the VOA used the name,I think it should not be used as a file name,regards. SD hehua (talk) 14:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
File:1949之後 - 右派狗崽子話當年.mp3 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SD hehua (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
File talk:1949之後 - 右派子女話當年.mp3[edit]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by SD hehua (talk • contribs) 10:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Question[edit]
About the folowing steps joining group —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1700:90D0:D30:1D06:4C2F:134B:A15B (talk) 04:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
License Review for Pictures from the Presidential Office's website[edit]
Thank you for the license review of File:20110306_馬英九總統出席一貫道祭天儀式_02.jpg. Could you please review the other photo called File:20110306_馬英九總統出席一貫道祭天儀式_01.jpg also? Since the template GWOIA has been edited, the original confirmed message can't be shown. S099001 (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Roy17/Leipzig[edit]
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Roy17/Leipzig, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 19042 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Roy17/Leipzig[edit]
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Roy17/Leipzig, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 35293 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC))
Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Roy17/Leipzig[edit]
Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Roy17/Leipzig, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 63417 files (including files already on the page).
This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).
Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.
Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC))
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:10 Things To Eat At Taipei's Raohe Street Night Market.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
图书上传[edit]
感谢您为图书分类。我上传了20万册图书,您还想看到更多吗?Commons_talk:Library_back_up_project#Books_uploaded!_Do_you_want_more? Upload for Freedom (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
COM:AN/U[edit]